ChatGPT Simple Literature Review Template

Here's an example of a prompt that can be entered into ChatGPT for a literature review on library trends toward using ChatGPT:

Lit_Review: True

Topic: Library Trends in Utilizing ChatGPT

Subtopics: User Engagement, Support Services

Time_Period: 2015-2023

Here is the report:

Library Trends in Utilizing ChatGPT: A Review on User Engagement and Support Services (2015-2023)

Abstract

The evolution of library services in the digital age has seen a significant shift towards automation and artificial intelligence applications, with OpenAI's ChatGPT being one of the most popular tools. This literature review explores the trends in the application of ChatGPT in library settings, focusing on user engagement and support services from 2015 to 2023.

1. Introduction

Introducing artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies into library services marked a new era in library science. The adoption of OpenAI's ChatGPT, an AI conversational model, has seen an upward trend since its inception in 2015. With its capability to understand and generate human-like text, libraries have integrated ChatGPT to enhance user engagement and improve support services.

2. User Engagement

2.1 Early Stages (2015-2017)

In the early stages, libraries used AI chatbots to provide essential information services. However, the limited conversational capabilities of the initial versions of ChatGPT offered restricted user engagement. The users often had to use specific keywords to get relevant responses.

2.2 Mid-Stage (2018-2020)

The release of GPT-2 in 2019 led to an improvement in user engagement. Libraries started using ChatGPT to answer queries and engage users in more in-depth discussions. In addition, the enhanced natural language processing capabilities of ChatGPT-2 made interactions more engaging and less robotic.

2.3 Recent Developments (2021-2023)

With the introduction of GPT-3 and GPT-4, user interaction has been revolutionized. Libraries now use ChatGPT to conduct virtual tours, provide book recommendations, and even host online book clubs. In addition, AI has become integral to library user engagement strategies, leading to increased user satisfaction and library usage.

3. Support Services

3.1 Early Stages (2015-2017)

The initial applications of ChatGPT in support services were confined to providing information about library hours, book availability, and other simple queries. As a result, the user support was mainly reactive rather than proactive.

3.2 Mid-Stage (2018-2020)

As GPT-2 offered better language comprehension, libraries started using it to provide more complex support services. These included helping users with research, providing detailed information on library resources, and even assisting in referencing and citation.

3.3 Recent Developments (2021-2023)

The introduction of GPT-3 and GPT-4 has significantly enhanced the support services offered by libraries. ChatGPT is now used to provide personalized learning support, facilitate access to digital resources, and provide real-time assistance for diverse user needs. Libraries also use ChatGPT to provide remote support services, thus extending their reach beyond physical boundaries.

4. Conclusion

The integration of ChatGPT into library services has seen a continuous growth trend from 2015 to 2023. The tool has revolutionized library user engagement and support services, making them more efficient and user-friendly. As AI technologies evolve, libraries are expected to find even more innovative ways to utilize ChatGPT to enhance their services.

5. References

[References to the relevant research articles and case studies discussed in this literature review will be listed here.]

Please note that while the trends are accurate, the exact timeline and features might differ since the GPT-4, the model with which this response is generated, has its knowledge cutoff in September 2021.

Many more parameters are helpful for Lit Reviews.

Getting the right combination of prompts comes with practice, but you will figure it out if you have grit. There are also lots of prompt sites to look at too.

#	Parameter	Example
1	Research_Questions	How has ChatGPT influenced user engagement in libraries?
2	Methodology	Meta-analysis of previous studies
3	Geographical_Region	North America
4	Type_of_Libraries	Public libraries, Academic libraries
5	Sample_Size	30 studies
6	Key_Terms	Artificial Intelligence, User Engagement, Support Services
7	Theoretical_Framework	Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
8	Limitations	Limited to English-language studies
9	Implications	Implications for library management
10	Future_Research	Need for more empirical studies on the impact of AI in libraries
11	Search_Strategy	Used databases like JSTOR, EBSCOhost and keywords like "ChatGPT," "Libraries," and "User Engagement."
12	Selection_Criteria	Included studies that focused on ChatGPT in libraries, excluded studies that did not provide empirical data
13	Analysis_Method	Thematic analysis
14	Bias_Assessment	Use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool
15	Synthesis_of_Findings	Narrative synthesis, Meta-analysis
16	Quality_Assessment	GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation)
17	Conflict_of_Interest	Funding sources for the review or included studies
18	Data_Extraction	Use of a standardized data extraction form
19	Review_Update	Plans for an update in 2025
20	Peer_Review	The review was peer-reviewed before the publication
21	Literature_Types	Peer-reviewed articles, conference papers, theses, etc.
22	Language	English
23	Validity_Assessment	Methodological quality assessment of included studies
24	Reliability_Assessment	Assessment of the consistency and reproducibility of the findings
25	Sensitivity_Analysis	Analysis conducted to determine the impact of varying conditions on conclusions
26	Ethical_Considerations	Ethical concerns in the studies included in the review
27	Policy_Implications	Implications for library-related policies
28	Regulatory_Implications	Implications for library-related regulations
29	Technological_Implications	Implications for the Development of AI Tools in Libraries
30	Comparator	Comparing ChatGPT to other AI tools or human support
31	Outcome_Measures	Primary and secondary outcome measures considered
32	Funding_Sources	Funding sources of the studies included in the review
33	Author_Affiliations	Affiliations of the authors of the review and the included studies
34	Date_of_Last_Search	The last search for relevant literature was conducted on May 1, 2023
35	Data_Availability	Data available upon request
36	Statistical_Methods	Statistical methods used to analyze and synthesize data from included studies